If you believe that your child is at risk of being taken out of the country by his other parent, or if this has already happened, there are several things you must and should do immediately. If your child is still in the country, you and your attorney should work on precautionary measures, such as finalizing a specific custody order, which is discussed in more detail below. If your child has already been taken, you should contact local law enforcement immediately and possibly file an application under the Hague Convention on Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, which is also explained in further detail below.Before your child is takenOftentimes, there are warning signs of the other parent's intentions. Being aware of these warning signs can help prevent a child abduction to a foreign country. Some of the things to look out for include whether the other parent lacks financial or familial ties to this country but has a strong network of family and friends in his or her home country. If he or she has threatened to take your child out of the country or tried to do so in the past, this is a major red flag. Also ask yourself if the other parent needs to be here for financial reasons or if he or she is financially independent, have they applied for a passport for themselves or the child, have they quit their job, sold their home or changed immigration status. These are all things that may point to an imminent departure and perhaps with your child.You should talk to your attorney immediately if you are concerned. Together, you can work on creating a custody order or modify an existing one with certain preventive measures.To be effective, the order should be specific and properly made. Visitation, for example, should outline certain days and times and not state "reasonable visitation" which is too subjective and difficult to enforce. You should also consider adding provisions about supervised visitation, allowing law enforcement to assist with violations of the order and specifically prohibiting certain pick up places such as day care or school.You should file an application under the Hague Convention immediately because if it has been over a year, the other country may decide that the child is already acclimated to the new country and should not be returned.A Hague Convention application is a civil matter, not criminal. An experienced attorney will help you weigh whether or not you should seek criminal charges against the other parent. Some countries will not return a child if the parent will be arrested or prosecuted. So, this is something you need to carefully weigh with your attorney.If your child has been taken to a country that is not part of the Hague Convention, you can try to go through the judicial system of that country to obtain a custody order in that country or have your existing custody order enforced. Of course, your success will depend on the facts and the country involved. While some countries have consistently worked with the U.S. in child abduction cases, other countries are less cooperative, and even resistant.Since local, federal and international laws are in play when a child is abducted and taken to a foreign country, it is highly recommended that you obtain an attorney experienced in not only international family law but child abduction. Such an attorney can guide you through the process and formulate a plan for returning your child safely.To learn more visit, http://www.findgreatlawyers.com/5ChildCustody.htm
>>> THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF MARYLAND AND WASHINGTON, D. C. ARE SUING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, CLAIMING HE HAS FAILED TO COMPLETELY SEPARATE HIMSELF FROM HIS VAST BUSINESS EMPIRE. AT THE CENTER OF IT IS THE LITTLE-KNOWN PIECE OF LAW KNOWN AS THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE. >> WE HAD JN THAN TURLEY ON EARLIER THIS MORNING. HE HAD A QUESTION ABOUT STANDING. DO YOU HAVE STANDING? >> WE BELIEVE WE HAVE STANDING ON TWO BASES, FIRST SOVEREIGN STANDING, THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ATTORNEY GENERALS TO PROTECT THEINTEREST OF THEIR RESIDENTS. IF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS VIOLATING THE FUNDAMENT ALAN TIE CORRUPTION LAW KNOWN AS THE EMOLUNTS CLAUSE TA GIVES US STANDING TO PROTECT OUR PEOPLE. YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT, JOE. THERE IS A NO DOUBT THAT THEY HAVE A ROLE IN THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE. HE WOULD HAVE THE FOLLOWING CHECKS AND BALANCES, THE PRESIDENT CHECKING HIMSELF, THENTHE STAFF CHECKING THE PRESIDENT THEN THE REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED CONGRESS CHECKING THE PRESIDENT. WE KNOW THAT'S NOT HAPPENING. IT'S THE PRESS, THE DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY GENERALS AND OTHERS WHOARE INVOKING THE CONSTITUTION AND TAKING THESE THINGS TO COURT. >> ALL RIGHT. HAROLD? >> GENERAL FROSH, HAROLD FORD. AT THE END OF HIS ANSWER HE SAID THIS IS A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED LAWSUIT BY TWO ATTORNEYS GENERAL WHO THE MAJORITY OF THEIR RESIDENTS DIDN'T SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP AND THEY PERSONALLY DON'T SUPPORT HIM. NUMBER ONE, HOW DO YOU REACT TO THAT? IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO BUILD ON GENERAL RACINE'S POINT, PLEASE DO. >> FIRST OF ALL, WE'RE WORKING WITH THE ETHICS ADVISER TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION. THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS THE KEY ANTI-CORRUPTION CLAUSE IN THE CONSTITUTION. IT PROTECTS EVERY AMERICAN FROM THE PRESIDENT PUTTING HIS INTERESTS ABOVE THOSE OF ALL OF THE REST OF US. I THINK EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW THAT WHEN THE PRESIDENT SENDS OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS INTO HARM'S WAY HE'S NOT DOING IT BECAUSE OF HIS BUSINESS INTERESTS. WE NODE TO KNOW THAT WHEN HE MAKES A DEAL WITH ANOTHER NATION HE'S NOT DOING IT BECAUSE HE HASA GOLF COURSE THERE. THIS IS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE. THIS IS AN ISSUE ABOUT PRESIDENTIAL HONESTY AND THE AVOIDANCE OF CORRUPTION. >> BRIAN, DOES IT CONCERN YOU ATALL WHEN PEOPLE HEAR ABOUT THIS SUIT OR READ ABOUT THIS SUIT THAT THERE'S A GENERAL KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS A BIG LEAGUE INVESTIGATION OF THE PRESIDENT GOING ON IN BOTH THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE AND AS A MAJOR LEAGUER BOB MUELLER CONDUCTING HIS OWN INVESTIGATION AND THAT PEOPLE WOULD THINK, MAN, THIS IS JUST NOW ALL POLITICS? THEY'RE JUST JUMPING ON THIS POOR GUY BECAUSE THE COUNTRY IS DIVIDED AND A LOT OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS WILL REFUSE TO BELIEVE ALMOST ANYTHING SAID OR FILED AGAINST HIM. DOES THAT CONCERN YOU AT ALL? >> WHAT CONCERNS ME IS YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO IS DOING SO MANYTHINGS THAT VIOLATE HIS OATH OF OATH OF OFFICE. SPECIFICALLY, THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROTECTIONS WE HAVE IN THE CONSTITUTION. MUELLER MAY BE LOOKING AT THINGS THAT RELATE TO THAT. THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION MAY UNVEIL SOME PAYMENTS THAT HE'S RECEIVED, TREATMENT HE'S RECEIVED FROM RUSSIA THAT AFFECTHIS CONDUCT, BUT OUR LAWSUIT IS ABOUT THINGS THAT WE KNOW HAVE HAPPENED. WE KNOW HE'S RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM CHINA. WE KNOW HE'S RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM SAUDI ARABIA, FROM QATAR, FROM AFGHANISTAN, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER COUNTRIES. AND WE KNOW HE'S MARKETING HIS PROPERTIES ADDITION. >> SO, LET ME INTERRUPT YOU. WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO PROVE HE'S GETTING MORE THAN MARKET VALUE OR MAYBE, PERHAPS, THOSE PAYMENTS HAVE INCREASED EXPONENTIALLY SINCE HE BECAME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? >> WELL, HE'S PROVED THAT HIMSELF. I MEAN, HE GOT ELECTED PRESIDENT. HE DOUBLED THE FEES AT MAR-A-LAGO, THAT'S HIS FLORIDA RESORT, FROM $100,000 TO $200,000. HE DOUBLED THE PRICE OF THE ROOMS AT THE TRUMP HOTEL IN WASHINGTON. AND HE HE BRAGS ABOUT WHAT A GREAT NEGOTIATOR HE IS, THAT CHINA IS ONE OF HIS BIGGEST TENANTS. HE HIMSELF HAS TESTIMONY -- >> BUT HE BRAGGED ABOUT CHINA BEING ONE OF HIS BIGGEST TENANTSDURING THE CAMPAIGN. I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING, IF YOU GO BEFORE THE COURT, DOESN'T JANUARY 20th HAVE TO BE THE CUTOFF DATE AND YOU SHOW THERE'S BEEN AN INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY FROM FOREIGN POWERS IN MONEY THAT'S GONE TO THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION? >> JOE, INC. YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT. JANUARY 20th IS THE KEY DATE. THAT'S THE DATE ON WHICH THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO PUT IN A CREDIBLE DIVESTMENT PLAN. THE FACT HE HASN'T, THE FACT HE'S SO WILLING ENTHUSIASTICALLYACCEPT MONEY FROM FOREIGN COUNTRY WHO IS CLEARLY HAVE AN INTEREST IN INFLUENCING AMERICAN POLICY IS WHY WE'RE FILING THIS LAWSUIT. >> STEVE RATTNER. >> HE INCREASED THOSE FEES AT MAR-A-LAGO SHORTLY BEFORE HE WASELECTED, NOT AFTER. THE PRESIDENT CAN BE SUED CIVILLY. SEE YOU'RE GOING TO SUBPOENA HISTAX RECORDS AND OTHER INTERESTING DOCUG DOCUMENTS. WHAT DO YOU SEE THE TIMELINE FOR THIS CASE? WHEN DO YOU THINK THIS WILL BE IN COURT IN A WAY WHERE WITH WE CAN FIND OUT WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THE PRESIDENT, HIS GUESTS, HIS TAXES AND BUSINESSES? >> THIS WILL BE AN EXTEND THE CIVIL LITIGATION. PRESIDENT HAS 60 DAYS TO ANSWER TO OUR COMPLAINT. WE EXPECT THE PRESIDENT AND THE DEPARTMENT TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS. I THINK YOU'RE LOOKING AT A PERIOD OF MONTHS. DURING THAT TIME FRAME, WE WILL BE SEEKING DISCOVERY. >>.
Indian Attorneys are people who have gone to law school and who practice the law. They must pass a big exam called the bar exam. This is what makes a student a certified attorney. Sometimes students can have a hard time determining what kind of law they want to practice because there are so many different types.
First, you need to consider all areas of the law. Once you have narrowed your choices down to a three you should start seeking as much information on those choices that you can possibly fund. You will also want to determine what type of firm you want to practice. Maybe you want to do corporate law where you have the opportunity to make partnerships or maybe you want to head out on your own.
Lawyers And Their Fees
There are so many areas of the law that some lawyers specialize in a couple areas, while some focus on just one area of the law. Practicing attorneys that do a generalization of many areas of the law are called general practitioners.
They don’t focus on all the areas, but they choose many areas in which to have great knowledge of. Specialists focus on one area. You may have criminal attorneys, tax attorneys, women’s rights attorneys, and so on. A general practitioner can handle most legal issues that are common.
If you are involved in a complex case or case that is worth a lot of money or a serious matter you will want a specialist. In some cases, people will have multiple attorneys so that they can make sure that their case is being handed to the firm’s full capability and so on.
When it comes to the lawyers, you will mostly see what special training they have gotten. Attorneys are just the name for anyone who can represent you in a court of law. They too have to pas a bar and are state certified. Any lawyer can be an attorney. The only thing is that some lawyers do not litigate.
BREAKING Trump Was Up All Night With Attorneys– Emerged With BIG Charges For Someone This Morning President Trump’s unconventional way ofdoing business in Washington has raised a lot of eyebrows. His background in business is one that puthim in a position with a whole lot of latitude. A businessman’s job is to work the systemin the smartest way possible to achieve the goal and to only bring in the lawyers if thingsgo south and can’t be handled with a handshake. President Trump’s new job in the Oval Officeis literally plagued by lawyers. Listening, analyzing, and in some cases, twistingfor their own devices. President Trump’s interactions with formerFBI Director James Comey no doubt intended to be a “lets get on the same page” kindof event but considering that President Trump tends to be an off the cuff kind of guy andJames Comey tends to be a by the book kind of guy, it’s safe to say that they didn’tsee eye to eye on everything. This led to a less than productive workingrelationship and the eventual firing of Comey. Which of course caused all the lawyers wholike to pick apart every single thing that the President does to sing with glee. They felt like this would be a great opportunityto pick him apart. However, when they called James Comey to speakunder oath, all that they found was a whole lot of reading into body language and “hoping”that the left decided to assume was illegal activity. But as was said in the hearing, nobody evergot sent to jail for “hoping” somebody would do something. Because of the way these allegations of misconductwith James Comey have drug on and brought no actual proof of wrongdoing, the Presidenthas decided to do something about it. Via CNN: “Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump’slegal team, in the wake of damning testimony from James Comey, plans to file a complaintagainst the former FBI director with the Justice Department Inspector General and the Senatejudiciary committee early next week, two sources with knowledge of the situation told CNN. The Justice Department, however, has limitedjurisdiction over former employees. They can investigate but the remedy in theevent of finding wrongdoing would be to make a note in Comey’s file should he ever seekto be employed by the Justice Department again. As a businessman, Trump had a long historyof threatening legal action. But the businessman-turned-president rarelyfollowed through on those claims. The new complaint will focus on Comey’stestimony that he gave a friend the content of memos about his conversations with Trumpand asked the friend to then give that information to a reporter. Comey said Friday that he gave the friend— later identified as Daniel Richman, a longtime Comey confidante and Columbia Universityprofessor — the information after Trump tweeted that he may have tapes of his conversationswith the fired FBI director. ‘My judgment was I needed to get that outinto the public square. So I asked a friend of mine to share the contentof the memo with a reporter,’ Comey said Thursday. Trump’s attorney, Marc Kasowitz, could filethe complaints early next week, one source said. Republicans have looked to discredit Comeyby calling him a ‘leaker’ because of the way he disseminated the information aboutTrump. Comey said Thursday that the memos he wrotewere unclassified. Disseminating unclassified information isgenerally not considered leaking and the President did not assert executive privilege over Comey’stestimony. The President himself accused Comey of lyingand leaking Friday on Twitter. ‘Despite so many false statements and lies,total and complete vindication…and WOW, Comey is a leaker!’ Trump tweeted Fridaymorning. The source said the fact that Comey decidedto disseminate the information because of a tweet was ‘gold’ for the lawyers lookingto file a complaint against the former FBI director. ” While it may be somewhat uncharted territoryfor a suit like this to go forward, the President has been plagued by those who will do anythingto make his presidency a failure. He’s kind of like a warrior being held downby a dozen tiny men who want to keep him down, and at some point, he has to stand up andthrow them off. If the media and the lawyers on the Hill whowant to pick him apart decided that they won’t quit, he’s going to have to hit them whereit hurts, otherwise, they’re keeping him from doing his job; and that’s not ok. (Source: CNN).