WE'RE GETTING CLOSER TO THE START OF FORMER UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI POLICE OFFICER RAY TENSING'S RETRIAL. A MOTION TO DISMISS THE CASE HAS BEEN DENIED. 9 IS ON YOUR SIDE IS BRINGING YOU EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW. KNOW. KRISTEN SWILLEY IS LIVE AT THE COURTHOUSE. KRISTEN - TODAY THE JUDGE COULD DECIDE IF A PIECE OF EVIDENCE WILL BE ALLOWED THIS TIME AROUND. PREJUDICIAL AND INFLAMMATORY - JUST SOME OF THE WORD'S THE DEFENSE IS USING TO DESCRIBE A CONTROVERSIAL PIECE OF EVIDENCE - THE T-SHIRT RAY TENSING WAS WEARING WHEN HE SHOT AND KILLED SAMUEL DUBOSE. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE IT HAS A CONFEDERATE FLAG ON IT. TENSING'S LEGAL TEAM SAYS IT DOESNT ADD ANY VALUE TO THE CASE, SAYING IT WOULD "UNDULY AROUSE THE PASSIONS OF THE JURY. " THE DEFENSE IS ALSO QUESTIONING THE CREDENTIALS OF THE PROSECUTION'S EXPERT ON THE CONTROVERSIAL BODY CAM VIDEO, THE SAME PERSON FROM THE FIRST TRIAL. THE PROSECUTION IS DOING THE SAME THING WITH THE DEFENSE'S EXPERT. THAT PERSON WAS LINED UP FOR THE FIRST TRIAL BUT NEVER CALLED TO TESTIFY. AND A CRITICAL STEP IS STILL AHEAD FOR BOTH SIDES - NARROWING DOWN THE JURY POOL THAT'S NOW 180 PEOPLE TO 12. 9 ON YOUR SIDE LEGAL ANALYST CARL LEWIS TALKED TO US. ABOUT WHAT COMES AFTER THE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SCRUTINIZED THIS WEEKEND. "The questionnaire is really just a preview of who you have in front of you until you can start diving into some very critical questions. You say that you're a member of the NRA. What are your feelings about guns? Why are you a member of the NRA? You said on this questionnaire you support thepolice 100%. What do you mean by that?" THAT HEARING BEGINS AT 9 A. M. REPORTING LIVE. KRISTEN SWILLEY. 9 ON YOUR SIDE. AND CHRIS -- I KNOW YOU SPENT A LOT OF TIME COVERING TENSING'S FIRST TRIAL. WE'RE STILL SEATING A JURY. BUT ARE YOU SEEING ANY DIFFERENCES IN HOW THE CASE IS BEING HANDLED? AD LIBS ANSWER OVER TENSING FIRST TRIAL BROLL. YOU CAN COUNT ON 9 ON YOUR SIDE FOR FULL COVERAGE OF RAY TENSING'S RETRIAL. WE'LL BE LIVE STARTING AT 4:30 AM HERE ON GOOD MORNING TRI-STATE STARTING TUESDAY. AND OUR COVERAGE WILL CONTINUE EVERYDAY UNTIL THE VERY END. AND FOR UPDATES WHEN YOU'RE AWAY FROM THE TELEVISION - GO TO WCPO DOT COM AND DOWNLOAD THE 9 ON YOUR SIDE APP.
lawyers deal with a wide array of cases that fall under the legal branch of labor law. These include discrimination on the basis of gender, race or age, sexual harassment, negligence in terms of safety conditions at work, issues of slavery and wages. These cases are usually extensive and demanding of both the defense and the prosecution sides, thus there is need to pick out the most competent lawyer to represent your case.Lawyers represent both corporate as well as individual clients who have a labor law case to pursue. The best ones are of course who have the portfolios that show these two types of clients as this will indicate to you what their legal philosophy is concerning labor rights and the issues that pertain to these. Therefore when factoring in which labor law attorney will represent your case it is very important to find a layer who does not have contradicting views as yours regarding the work place case that you are involved in. Give that some cases of labor discrimination are embarrassing, be certain about the lawyer's stance toward discrimination, harassment, and abuse.Lawyers are widely available on the internet through specialized legal advice sites. The lawyers that can be easily accessed and that are recommended by the trustworthy sites are a good place to start in your search for a labor law attorney. Seeking the advice of friends and other clients who have been represented by this lawyer is also highly recommended. Lawyers are best found through the legal authorities such as the Bar Association, the Law Society, and the Solicitors Regulation Authorities among others. In fact, this latter method of finding a labor law attorney is the most preferred given the large number of firms and lawyers that are in the city.
Indian Attorneys are people who have gone to law school and who practice the law. They must pass a big exam called the bar exam. This is what makes a student a certified attorney. Sometimes students can have a hard time determining what kind of law they want to practice because there are so many different types.
First, you need to consider all areas of the law. Once you have narrowed your choices down to a three you should start seeking as much information on those choices that you can possibly fund. You will also want to determine what type of firm you want to practice. Maybe you want to do corporate law where you have the opportunity to make partnerships or maybe you want to head out on your own.
Lawyers For Labor Law Representation
There are so many areas of the law that some lawyers specialize in a couple areas, while some focus on just one area of the law. Practicing attorneys that do a generalization of many areas of the law are called general practitioners.
They don’t focus on all the areas, but they choose many areas in which to have great knowledge of. Specialists focus on one area. You may have criminal attorneys, tax attorneys, women’s rights attorneys, and so on. A general practitioner can handle most legal issues that are common.
If you are involved in a complex case or case that is worth a lot of money or a serious matter you will want a specialist. In some cases, people will have multiple attorneys so that they can make sure that their case is being handed to the firm’s full capability and so on.
When it comes to the lawyers, you will mostly see what special training they have gotten. Attorneys are just the name for anyone who can represent you in a court of law. They too have to pas a bar and are state certified. Any lawyer can be an attorney. The only thing is that some lawyers do not litigate.
>>> THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF MARYLAND AND WASHINGTON, D. C. ARE SUING THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, CLAIMING HE HAS FAILED TO COMPLETELY SEPARATE HIMSELF FROM HIS VAST BUSINESS EMPIRE. AT THE CENTER OF IT IS THE LITTLE-KNOWN PIECE OF LAW KNOWN AS THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE. >> WE HAD JN THAN TURLEY ON EARLIER THIS MORNING. HE HAD A QUESTION ABOUT STANDING. DO YOU HAVE STANDING? >> WE BELIEVE WE HAVE STANDING ON TWO BASES, FIRST SOVEREIGN STANDING, THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ATTORNEY GENERALS TO PROTECT THEINTEREST OF THEIR RESIDENTS. IF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS VIOLATING THE FUNDAMENT ALAN TIE CORRUPTION LAW KNOWN AS THE EMOLUNTS CLAUSE TA GIVES US STANDING TO PROTECT OUR PEOPLE. YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT, JOE. THERE IS A NO DOUBT THAT THEY HAVE A ROLE IN THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE. HE WOULD HAVE THE FOLLOWING CHECKS AND BALANCES, THE PRESIDENT CHECKING HIMSELF, THENTHE STAFF CHECKING THE PRESIDENT THEN THE REPUBLICAN-CONTROLLED CONGRESS CHECKING THE PRESIDENT. WE KNOW THAT'S NOT HAPPENING. IT'S THE PRESS, THE DEMOCRATIC ATTORNEY GENERALS AND OTHERS WHOARE INVOKING THE CONSTITUTION AND TAKING THESE THINGS TO COURT. >> ALL RIGHT. HAROLD? >> GENERAL FROSH, HAROLD FORD. AT THE END OF HIS ANSWER HE SAID THIS IS A POLITICALLY MOTIVATED LAWSUIT BY TWO ATTORNEYS GENERAL WHO THE MAJORITY OF THEIR RESIDENTS DIDN'T SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP AND THEY PERSONALLY DON'T SUPPORT HIM. NUMBER ONE, HOW DO YOU REACT TO THAT? IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO BUILD ON GENERAL RACINE'S POINT, PLEASE DO. >> FIRST OF ALL, WE'RE WORKING WITH THE ETHICS ADVISER TO THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION AND GEORGE W. BUSH ADMINISTRATION. THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS THE KEY ANTI-CORRUPTION CLAUSE IN THE CONSTITUTION. IT PROTECTS EVERY AMERICAN FROM THE PRESIDENT PUTTING HIS INTERESTS ABOVE THOSE OF ALL OF THE REST OF US. I THINK EVERY AMERICAN NEEDS TO KNOW THAT WHEN THE PRESIDENT SENDS OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS INTO HARM'S WAY HE'S NOT DOING IT BECAUSE OF HIS BUSINESS INTERESTS. WE NODE TO KNOW THAT WHEN HE MAKES A DEAL WITH ANOTHER NATION HE'S NOT DOING IT BECAUSE HE HASA GOLF COURSE THERE. THIS IS NOT A PARTISAN ISSUE. THIS IS AN ISSUE ABOUT PRESIDENTIAL HONESTY AND THE AVOIDANCE OF CORRUPTION. >> BRIAN, DOES IT CONCERN YOU ATALL WHEN PEOPLE HEAR ABOUT THIS SUIT OR READ ABOUT THIS SUIT THAT THERE'S A GENERAL KNOWLEDGE THAT THERE IS A BIG LEAGUE INVESTIGATION OF THE PRESIDENT GOING ON IN BOTH THE SENATE AND THE HOUSE AND AS A MAJOR LEAGUER BOB MUELLER CONDUCTING HIS OWN INVESTIGATION AND THAT PEOPLE WOULD THINK, MAN, THIS IS JUST NOW ALL POLITICS? THEY'RE JUST JUMPING ON THIS POOR GUY BECAUSE THE COUNTRY IS DIVIDED AND A LOT OF TRUMP SUPPORTERS WILL REFUSE TO BELIEVE ALMOST ANYTHING SAID OR FILED AGAINST HIM. DOES THAT CONCERN YOU AT ALL? >> WHAT CONCERNS ME IS YOU HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO IS DOING SO MANYTHINGS THAT VIOLATE HIS OATH OF OATH OF OFFICE. SPECIFICALLY, THE EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PROTECTIONS WE HAVE IN THE CONSTITUTION. MUELLER MAY BE LOOKING AT THINGS THAT RELATE TO THAT. THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION MAY UNVEIL SOME PAYMENTS THAT HE'S RECEIVED, TREATMENT HE'S RECEIVED FROM RUSSIA THAT AFFECTHIS CONDUCT, BUT OUR LAWSUIT IS ABOUT THINGS THAT WE KNOW HAVE HAPPENED. WE KNOW HE'S RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM CHINA. WE KNOW HE'S RECEIVING PAYMENTS FROM SAUDI ARABIA, FROM QATAR, FROM AFGHANISTAN, AND A NUMBER OF OTHER COUNTRIES. AND WE KNOW HE'S MARKETING HIS PROPERTIES ADDITION. >> SO, LET ME INTERRUPT YOU. WOULDN'T YOU HAVE TO PROVE HE'S GETTING MORE THAN MARKET VALUE OR MAYBE, PERHAPS, THOSE PAYMENTS HAVE INCREASED EXPONENTIALLY SINCE HE BECAME PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES? >> WELL, HE'S PROVED THAT HIMSELF. I MEAN, HE GOT ELECTED PRESIDENT. HE DOUBLED THE FEES AT MAR-A-LAGO, THAT'S HIS FLORIDA RESORT, FROM $100,000 TO $200,000. HE DOUBLED THE PRICE OF THE ROOMS AT THE TRUMP HOTEL IN WASHINGTON. AND HE HE BRAGS ABOUT WHAT A GREAT NEGOTIATOR HE IS, THAT CHINA IS ONE OF HIS BIGGEST TENANTS. HE HIMSELF HAS TESTIMONY -- >> BUT HE BRAGGED ABOUT CHINA BEING ONE OF HIS BIGGEST TENANTSDURING THE CAMPAIGN. I GUESS WHAT I'M SAYING, IF YOU GO BEFORE THE COURT, DOESN'T JANUARY 20th HAVE TO BE THE CUTOFF DATE AND YOU SHOW THERE'S BEEN AN INCREASE EXPONENTIALLY FROM FOREIGN POWERS IN MONEY THAT'S GONE TO THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION? >> JOE, INC. YOU'RE EXACTLY RIGHT. JANUARY 20th IS THE KEY DATE. THAT'S THE DATE ON WHICH THE PRESIDENT SHOULD HAVE TAKEN STEPS TO PUT IN A CREDIBLE DIVESTMENT PLAN. THE FACT HE HASN'T, THE FACT HE'S SO WILLING ENTHUSIASTICALLYACCEPT MONEY FROM FOREIGN COUNTRY WHO IS CLEARLY HAVE AN INTEREST IN INFLUENCING AMERICAN POLICY IS WHY WE'RE FILING THIS LAWSUIT. >> STEVE RATTNER. >> HE INCREASED THOSE FEES AT MAR-A-LAGO SHORTLY BEFORE HE WASELECTED, NOT AFTER. THE PRESIDENT CAN BE SUED CIVILLY. SEE YOU'RE GOING TO SUBPOENA HISTAX RECORDS AND OTHER INTERESTING DOCUG DOCUMENTS. WHAT DO YOU SEE THE TIMELINE FOR THIS CASE? WHEN DO YOU THINK THIS WILL BE IN COURT IN A WAY WHERE WITH WE CAN FIND OUT WHAT WAS GOING ON WITH THE PRESIDENT, HIS GUESTS, HIS TAXES AND BUSINESSES? >> THIS WILL BE AN EXTEND THE CIVIL LITIGATION. PRESIDENT HAS 60 DAYS TO ANSWER TO OUR COMPLAINT. WE EXPECT THE PRESIDENT AND THE DEPARTMENT TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS. I THINK YOU'RE LOOKING AT A PERIOD OF MONTHS. DURING THAT TIME FRAME, WE WILL BE SEEKING DISCOVERY. >>.